Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ken Hilburn's avatar

James, I’ve been stalking… er … following you for … years now I guess? I can assure you this CGPT farce isn’t you. It certainly and disappointingly flubbed your tone. But more importantly, it didn’t even try to make a point! Your stuff is good to no small extent because you _always_ have a point. A good point. But that CGPT impersonation was just meaningless blather. Thanks again for all the effort you put into this substack!

Or, I could have just said: “yep, your job is safe. For now :-))”

Expand full comment
Robert Webster's avatar

The article uses mannyyy big words that make it hard to read. Clearly the bots reckon you have good vocabulary - and that you put it to use- take that as a complement! Except... Your articles are readable.

Thanks for all the work you put in :)

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts